nextgap.com

Reviews, Impressions, Tips, DIY and good stuff…

nextgap.com header image 2

Soundcraft Compact 4 mixer review

June 12th, 2008 · 4 Comments

Lately I’ve been starting to get into music making once again. For this I needed a good but affordable mixer. I planned a budget of around 100$.

What I needed in a mixer:

  1. be able to use both Dynamic microphone (Shure SM58 for ex.) and/or condenser microphone
  2. play (and record) electric & bass guitars
  3. preamp (for the guitars)
  4. minimum hiss as possible (noise)
  5. compactness
  6. affordable

I was thinking of two mixers: the Mackie 402 VLZ3 4 Ch. and the Soundcraft Compact 4 , both cost about the same and considered to be the best choice for small mixers. Which one to choose? I had no idea, so to start, I asked around. One guitarist friend of mine told me that Mackie’s are considered a good choice, while a drummer friend said he has a Soundcraft and he is pleased. Both of them are professional musicians btw.

The ear test: I bought the Soundcraft, but to be sure, I asked my guitarist friend to use his “connections” and get me a Mackie, just to test it. I had 24 hours to decide on which, So I started by connecting both mixers, one at a time ofcourse, recording vocals and guitar samples via a JULI@ soundcard.

In all the tests I made, the Soundcraft was better, mainly because it produced much less hiss (noise) than the Mackie. When it comes to recording (especially vocals), you should look for the quietest mixer you can buy.

What else? the Soundcraft has an earth (ground) metal bar on it’s side. I’ve found it very useful when connecting a PHONO (the good old vinyl record player) ground wire to it. That completely canceled all the hiss (it didn’t eliminate the scratches though…).

Another important thing is the equalizer. The Soundcraft has a 3 band equalizer (hi, low, mid), while the Mackie has a 2 band (hi, lo, with no mid), and while that doesn’t seem that important, it is, because vocals and guitars are mostly middle frequencies, so there’s no reason you shouldn’t have full control over that.

Size: the Soundcraft is a bit bigger than the Mackie, but you can take of the two plastic protective side bars in a second if you prefer the naked look.

Soundcraft Pros:

  • connecting a record player (for just listening to your old vinyls or converting them to MP3′s)
  • preamp for an electric guitar or bass
  • 3 band equalizer for each channel
  • record vocals with a dynamic microphone
  • phantom power for a condenser microphone too
  • earth (ground) connection
  • protective plastic side panels (detachable)

Cons:

  • no power button (the Mackie doesn’t have one as well) so either you pull out the power supply cable OR do as I did, and use a socket with an on/off switch
  • a bit wider than the Mackie, with the two plastic side panels attached (can be removed)

Soundcraft mixer on AMAZON.COM

Mackie mixer on AMAZON.COM

********  LONG TERM UPDATE TO THIS ARTICLE *******

05/april/2009

I’ve just noticed that Chanel 1 MIC inner contacts are loose, therefore when plugging a PL in, it doesn’t seat tight and snugly. Touching the plug or moving the cable produces noise.

See it in the mixer diagram – it’s the first top left input, where it says “mic in”. It’s a NEUTRIK made MIC input, BUT, a regular PL can be inserted in it’s middle as well.

Two weeks from the warranty expiration , I am sending the MIXER into the lab (up to 7 days I was told it will be ready, from today).

06/april/2009

Got the mixer back (yes, that was quick). I plugged a PL connector in, it felt to fit snugly,so the problem seemed to be solved. The lab info page said it was a “Soldering problem of the channel 1 MIC input-  Soldering was strengthened.”

In any case, I can’t tell if this will happen in every mixer, but if you ask my opinion, I would still choose this mixer.

I will keep updating for any important info.

14/Aug/2009 – This mixer is getting harder to find. Last time I checked, it was out of stock in AMAZON. I’ll try to add more shop links soon.

Share

Tags: Musical Instruments

RATING:


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...





  • Pingback: Mixer Wiring Diagram

  • Chris

    I’d’ve suggested the Mackie desk as their Mic Preamps are of a much higher quality than the soundcraft, even on the low-end desks such as this. You should never run line inputs into a desk in the first place, a DI will cost you $80 and make an infinite difference to the quality of sound, as it balances the signal before your desk receives it…Definitely worth a purchase. Also – your SM58 review…I would avoid the 58s for recording. The dynamic range of these microphones makes them ideal for general use in live performance but they’re definitely not for recording. You’d be better off spending a tiny bit more and grabbing the Rode NT1-A. This mic has a perfect 20/20 response, and a SPL somewhere in the range of 130dB. However, in comparison, this mic is definitely not for live performances.

  • admin

    Thanks for your comment. The Rode NT1-A sounds like a good choice but it does have a price tag of 230$ …while the Shure sells for about 100$… if you tend to use the mic indoors only and for recording only, yes, a condenser is a better choice.
    If you need to go up on a stage, and you have only 100$ in your pocket buy the Shure. If you can afford, buy them both :)

    Regarding the DI is there any recommendation?
    And is that really critical? at least in some reviews I read it’s not (for ex here: http://www.harmony-central.com/articles/tips/balanced_vs_unbalanced/). But I guess again, it depends how much you want to invest and what you want to reach for.

    I’m sure the Mackie can do the job. But at least for my ears, the Soundcraft was quieter a bit.

    Ilan.

  • admin

    PS. one more thing, the Soundcraft 4 was discontinued and is No longer available in AMAZON and most of shops, but still can be found on Ebay, at least the last time I checked.

Share this article on Facebook